[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] XaAES
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Lonny Pursell<email@example.com> wrote:
> on 7/23/09 12:52 PM, Kåre Andersen wrote:
>> On 23. juli 2009, at 18.32, Lonny Pursell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Speaking of keyboard.c
>>> This section:
>>> # if 0
>>> /* bit 2 of conterm variable decides, whether we
>>> * put the shift status to the buffer or not.
>>> if ((*(uchar *)0x0484L & 0x04) == 0)
>>> c0 = 0;
>>> # endif
>>> Shouldn't this be bit 3 ??
>>> Lonny Pursell http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/
>> Nope, count from 0 :)
>> Also, #if 0 <code> #endif is, the c preproccessor equivalent of
>> remming out a bunch of lines...
> Is not 0x04 -> %100 ?
> That's the bit for the system bell.
> I know it's used by the preproccessor but still the bit for bconin() would
> be 0x08 -> %1000
> Have a look at some memory map for 'conterm'.
Ah, now I see what you mean, and yes of course you are right... Still
the code is not in effect (not compiled in), so it should not affect
Snooped a bit around in the kernel sources, but have not been able to
locate the shift enabling bit anywhere else. Its probably there tho :)