On 1/13/10 11:42 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
That's fine, wasn't sure if it was worth a full bump but now that I think about it, it makes sense. New patch attached.On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:33 -0500, Mark Duckworth wrote:On 1/13/10 11:34 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:25 -0500, Mark Duckworth wrote:First patch ever so don't be surprised that it does nothing ;) Here is a patch to increment the mintlib to 0.58.1. Keith, Mikro, Vincent and I noted that we need to have a mintlib release in order to continue rebuilding sparemint and other things and we all think that the current mintlib is rather stable and has a lot of fixes. If there is no objection from Alan, please apply the patch and I will create a release rpm.Did we have a 0.58.0 release ?? If not, then we should do that first. Alan.Yeah it's up on sparemint.Given that was back in Apr 2008, I'm inclined to go for 0.59.0 as there have been lots of changes. Alan.
Thanks, Mark
diff -urN mintlib.orig/configvars mintlib/configvars --- mintlib.orig/configvars Fri May 29 19:23:52 2009 +++ mintlib/configvars Wed Jan 13 11:46:14 2010 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # serve both as input to "make" and a Bourne shell. # Define this to the version of the package. -VERSION=0.58.0 +VERSION=0.59.0 # Define this if you cross-compile. When cross-compiling some files # (notably programs and commands like zic, zdump or tzselect) won't diff -urN mintlib.orig/mintlib.spec mintlib/mintlib.spec --- mintlib.orig/mintlib.spec Tue Apr 29 08:01:48 2008 +++ mintlib/mintlib.spec Wed Jan 13 11:46:18 2010 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ %else Name : cross-mint-libc %endif -Version : 0.58.0 +Version : 0.59.0 Release : 1 Group : Base Copyright : distributable