[MiNT] Peter's emails [was Re: double-click crash]

[Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>]

Peter, 

I'm not sure what's wrong but I always seem to get your emails delayed
about 4 hours. Looking at the headers of this message it was created on
your machine at 11:13 today, but only arrived at it's first hop at
smtp.freeola.net at 13:46. Is there a date problem on your machine ? or
do you only connect periodically and upload mails then ??

Alan.

On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Peter Slegg wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:28:01 , "Jo Even Skarstein" <joska@online.no> wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Peter Slegg" <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:42 AM
> > To: <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
> > Subject: Re: [MiNT] double-click crash
> >
> > There's a lot of potential problems in this list!
> >
> > > bash-2.05a# ps -A
> > > PID  PPID PRI CURPRI STATUS   SIZE    TIME    COMMAND
> >
> > > 020  000   0     0  TSR       65536 00:00.10  LDG
> >
> > Problems with MP, generally unstable on my Milan.
> >
> > > 021  000   0     0  TSR       16384 00:00.06  MACCEL3
> >
> > Don't know if this is unstable, but why not use the Milan-specific CPX
> > instead?
> 
> I've never heard of one. Without Maccel the mouse is dog slow.
> I did try another mouse accelerator about 10 years ago but it didn't
> work.
> 
> > > 095  094   0     0  Sleep     65536 00:00.01  bubble
> >
> > BubbleGEM is - and it hurts to say this because the concept is cool - a
> > piece of sh*t. It's capable of locking both my Falcon and Milan solid when
> > using MiNT. Please remove, including the CPX.
> 
> I've never had any problems at all although not many apps use it.
> I suspect not all Milans are the same.
> 
>  
> > > 096  094   0     0  Sleep     32768 00:00.00  cache040
> >
> > What's this?
> 
> It's an ACC from controlling the cpu caches. I never use it.
>  
> > > 097  094   0     0  Sleep    221184 00:00.64  cops
> >
> > Are you using the version from the FreeMiNT-build? Older versions doesn't
> > work too well outside MagiC.
> 
> The one I use it dated 1998. I tried some of the later ones and they
> mangled the icons and crashed badly. This one is the most stable and
> doesn't give any obvious problems.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>