Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib / Kernel Future and also SpareMiNT.....

["Ole Loots" <ole@monochrom.net>]

Am Do, 27.05.2010, 19:54 schrieb Keith Scroggins:


>
> Now, the other question is Sparemint.  Where should it head?  Are people
> still willing to build RPMs and support the software, and do people still
> want the software supported?

Yeah, I would like to build and support RPM's, I think it's ok for some
packages (at least for the simple packages)...

>
> The other issue with Sparemint (well RPM), at least in my opinion, is
> architecture support.  By default, unless currently noted, RPMs are built
> for a 68000 target.  Should that remain the same, or should this expand so
> that packages are also target at 68020-60 and then later at the Coldfire?
> If so, how?

I would like to see architecture optimized RPM's. I don't care how it's
done (right now), and I don't know how it could be done. But I think there
should be an clean and straight way for targeting different architectures
+ installing for different architectures.

greets...