[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....

To: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:24:15 -0400
Cc: "<mint@lists.fishpool.fi>" <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
In-reply-to: <00023cad.02125262a4aa@smtp.freeola.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C147D55.7080404@freesbee.fr> <00023cad.02125262a4aa@smtp.freeola.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

I say we archive the entrety of what is there and go to town on it.Then at least we have a reference if someone complains about futurechanges


Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>wrote:

Should the old sparemint package webpages be archived (but
still accessible) beforec we switch to a newer gcc ?

Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
  - From: Paul Wratt <paul.wratt@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
  - From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.59.1 for your testing pleasure....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread