[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Cosmetic bugfix
To
: Helmut Karlowski <
helmut.karlowski@ish.de
>
Subject
: Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Cosmetic bugfix
From
: Miro Kropáček <
miro.kropacek@gmail.com
>
Date
: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:40:56 +0100
Cc
: "
mint@lists.fishpool.fi
" <
mint@lists.fishpool.fi
>
Dkim-signature
: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=64pSH2WZivDXa/pjjI2k0zAQ1SIYsuAUqaPaBW6Tolk=; b=NGABHIXPF23P7rjDPteiYmFztj9X6frbpVmI5I9Uq75HcM2nj85WDIi8HKHDpZ3vpX bRiTn1kEU+RPvl/sbqERP3HpnstFoiKpHhfbbcMtuIRelHQQMc7ltNlQmAdW+hLMLqzj gAIpP52nckdqibcqeWSuZPzCxsE0jpKeG+qdA=
Domainkey-signature
: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iWmYedWVgENXP7HdOrv/4MDqEJ/E9BHtWJ32mbCk1I5QTs7CVnVkldVQWXfDm4WKjB k56wkuQ4+PcQDwn+ZglUBhXITrMsiH7SXRM8jkVPon31sMhty+CaomgeAv8v3GZ/hDHH SkGRpILArLA31XvTcTw+lHkpY+akqjGdWKQEE=
In-reply-to
: <311698.28595327-sendEmail@descaro>
List-help
: <
mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help
>
List-id
: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner
: <
mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi
>
List-post
: <
mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe
>
References
: <311698.28595327-sendEmail@descaro>
Sender
:
mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
> This is a bad idea to use %d.
VINCEnt, that conVINCEd me, I'll change it.
If you take a look at my first message, I wrote nearly the same (but not as cool as Vincent did), if the __LINE__ is lower than 32768, int will be always used.
--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org
References
:
Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Cosmetic bugfix
From:
"Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
Prev by Date:
Re: [MiNT] XaAES multi-language help needed
Next by Date:
Re: [MiNT] Where should a user put GEM apps
Previous by thread:
Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Cosmetic bugfix
Next by thread:
Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Cosmetic bugfix
Index(es):
Date
Thread