[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] kernel modules

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:40:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <4D9A291F.8000406@monochrom.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D997808.7080008@freesbee.fr> <0005fbf6.01c695f8fff8@smtp.freeola.net> <1301944418.2316.0.camel@sterkenils> <4D9A291F.8000406@monochrom.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9

m0n0 wrote:

I think the real question is: is it better/required to have coldfire kernel
modules. This isn't really answered.

I will not tolerate any "emulated instruction" on my FireBee. So I willbuild ColdFire kernel modules. At least for myself.Furthermore, it would be a total nonsense to use open-source software withemulated binaries.


--
Vincent Rivière

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
  - From: m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
  - From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
  - From: m0n0 <ole@monochrom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] kernel modules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread