[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies

To: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:35:57 +0200
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bqfQp7G/7RR1Uj+q/KXU1ZGkZ8YLc4Hve1UXXK6fIB8=; b=sf2p2yD3yv7b/uULa4UeJJwamLB3qirZUg+y3AfgcJM23uZ9M2AZk9eFcGUchLxFB8 91WqW9/mm1+AB+bRlS6Ruewqb/7ir4BqkY9pmj2n0vdG4HSNfW3v6Nx7fbwONsvFTvpX j1tm9tKvMNW9zIFukQMsmBT8CROfpr2JZnGyg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZkKsnNtKW5HrXbWqAse7NOlZTk4/28SY2cUSSdZJDC3m9TkEP+l2h91TevapXUAr6v E4dKBFBrgxbm6YVCpy5xK0xXHPyHHqNH8ADOEybMNXtgrAWylopjbnek39gjXm+5IkKI 8AOqwF0oKkOj1Mp2jCqvy+hw16ZPrzmhVCGik=
In-reply-to: <BANLkTimKuvEU7vXpRLfvPUEo73B4YBofvw@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00933E7C-3B49-425B-AFCD-C7BF39DCD2AE@gmail.com> <c6533ef61002020705h7e2c02ccke004dffd384887bd@mail.gmail.com> <1302281984.1943.2.camel@sterkenils> <BANLkTikTPmKGcKLK_n-A9rnhQjKS9SCMdg@mail.gmail.com> <1302453469.2318.4.camel@sterkenils> <BANLkTik=F9+RqOE9L9tfebC=vN6Lzc5pug@mail.gmail.com> <1302454717.2318.15.camel@sterkenils> <BANLkTimKuvEU7vXpRLfvPUEo73B4YBofvw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com> wrote:

maybe you can compile for the Coldfire?
I gave it a try, I had to patch some LDG asm code for CF but what's most interesting, I found bug in g++ --

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48551. Until this is fixed, I can't make a build. Or maybe it's fixed in 4.6.0 but we don't have it yet.

Wow, it seems I've got either serious problems with my setup or gcc has got some serious CF regressions... just for fun I wanted to try 4.6.0 and it crashed for coldfire even by mintlib compilation.

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: David Gálvez <dgalvez75@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
  - From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] LDG vs. SLB vs. custom OVL-thingies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread