[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] _CPU cookie

2011/7/28 Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>:
> Paul Wratt wrote:
>>
>> What do other CPU with FPU say for _CPU cookie
>
> On the FireBee:
>
> - FireTOS emulates a 68060 (but without FPU). _CPU is 60 (but _CF_ is
> present, indicating that the underlying CPU is a ColdFire).
>
> - EmuTOS for ColdFire has not 680x0 emulation, so the _CPU cookie does not
> exist at all (but _CF_ is present). So a thin 680x0 emulation layer could be
> added as a TSR in the AUTO folder and add its _CPU cookie accordingly.
>
> --
> Vincent Rivière
>
>
so on is the following correct:
0x5F435055 (_CPU): 0x0000003C
0x5F465055 (_FPU): 0x00000000

or without _FPU, what about the value(s) of _CF_ cookie and _MCH?


------------------------------------------------

so I guess for CT6x it looks like:
0x5F435055 (_CPU): 0x0000003C
0x5F465055 (_FPU): 0x00100000
0x5F4D4348 (_MCH): 0x00030000


Is there anyway a CT6x can exist without an 060 cpu? (or fpu like on CF/FireBee)

Paul