[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log

To: "mint@lists.fishpool.fi" <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
From: WongCK <wongck68@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 19:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1359345283; bh=2E9w/oPjTw6EYMrvquL2LCOJbA1oMYlTu0n1Y7UehA0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=O5LLN1EjPMoJYqoIQImGYH3RoJoNPc7v0BC7sUi1Hdyzn9NZTpK0KtHevosEHcu5S9zJEUTFqLWFW4Q7dvNzQ5gmzgusY9bgJwym4QY6PnZDke9S1dvfHFscpBwTalKNa0ZVKBBZjLE64cA6i9Zt7krNh+uoJIRqnTzQbfXSoO4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=X2GcE7RMj7Vumd/yyvI8PU3FVXI5JSaIaGVzwq1/ynKzsNB4FESUvUKoPj++fvJ/8Gm7AE9eX+HCX/XNKKLPhh2Bdt160C8YyWa56hqTxFcLWfaCOnn0Nmv59l27qAEI0GYz8A7OwYQMEUBYiogwVlZ5bEF7L1J8e5E5SKFLftI=;
In-reply-to: <51045ABC.10465.D554F9@rfburrows.ymail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <5102FE07.20001@freesbee.fr>, <op.wrirk3xvofd6j1@nebbiolo>, <1359228018.1958.46.camel@schizonils> <51045ABC.10465.D554F9@rfburrows.ymail.com>
Reply-to: WongCK <wongck68@yahoo.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi


> I think the reason there's a difference of opinion here is that Helmut is 
> looking at it from the POV of a developer where things are *always* going 
> wrong, whilst Jo Even is looking at it from the POV of a user where things 
> should *never* go wrong.
> 


As a user, I have been setting my xa_boot.log to read-only for several years now.
It's like the first few thing I do when I setup a Mint system.
Not only it makes my boot up significantly faster (not everyone of us is using a FB),
I also do not have to worry about having a large file hording my hard disk.

And one more thing... the system does not crash more often if there is no boot log.
IMHO, Mint/Xaaes is rather stable. Only apps crashes.

Just my 2 cents.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
  - From: "J. F. Lemaire" <jflemaire@skynet.be>

References:
- [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
- Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
  - From: Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>
- Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
  - From: "Roger Burrows" <rfburrows@ymail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] GEM mainloop and time consuming tasks
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] C:\MINT directory locked & xa_boot.log
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread