Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Machine dependent module path extension

[Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>]

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 12:24 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:

> > What mess?
> >
> 
> I guess you end up with....
> 
> xaaes014.rsc
> xaaes015.rsc
> xaaes016.rsc

Exactly, and a very precise description of the contents of the xaaes
folder on my Firebee right now.

> We don't have things like ext2fs01.xfs, ext2fs02.xfs etc, so I guess why 
> should RSC's be versioned in the filename when things are versioned and 
> checked in the file themselves ??

It's rather pointless. I'd say leave the functionality in (I can see it
can be useful if a developer needs two versions of XaAES installed) but
only keep xaaes.rsc in the CVS. XaAES will load it, it will check that
it's the correct version and the user don't end up with multiple
resource-files when (s)he upgrades to the next minor version.

Jo Even