[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:57:42 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mBs9mUfcgybPdn77cCk8bEnkNBAwNZTurN+W5QvPLi0=; b=wkwrU+0qM8lzFRS/D+Uu8eXi4QGm3ETOvjGODiwf4RVWgDDcrOZJk4t3koUOAaxc+Y lLVfbijcfUAfmuqMOsFEnf+X86JmTRKFNdKDLlokpWIF0p3KftUBh7jlyNYAOElJAkXq n+JmMc36kxSS7pBnCWkk8tnilKyJdhqHRVfNsqIsfAsFk2nViKiSnYKQMdyD4B8D2BMO xk5a4JDyU9OrWZikhNSN+SIZQ/1WB+bSijustrJhdacKhH/S8ySLHy+xE+W/Y/0zqAOZ EPwJvstiM98NO0CpcByudYQibRXnxB3GALswfe6e2nZqgXD5G9kCo8uZHGP0YPRtWO1F 2Flw==
In-reply-to: <op.wr8095r3ofd6j1@nebbiolo>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <51166E1C.2080807@freesbee.fr> <op.wr8w3c1cofd6j1@nebbiolo> <51167BD9.1040202@freesbee.fr> <op.wr8095r3ofd6j1@nebbiolo>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 09/02/2013 18:23, Helmut Karlowski wrote:

Still not convinced what is wrong from your description, but I'd have to
look myself I guess.


The situation is very simple.

nano uses termios to remove the IEXTEN flag, but it still expects to receiveescape sequences for the arrow keys.

So:

- Either MiNTLib/FreeMiNT is fixed to behave like Linux (send escapesequences for the arrow keys, even if IEXTEN is disabled).


- Either nano is fixed to not disable IEXTEN.

Either solution will fix the problem at the kernel level (for nano on theBIOS console and TosWin2 in tw52 mode).

Anyway, when the TosWin2 bug regarding the tw100 mode is fixed, as a sideeffect that will also fix nano, because the TosWin2 behiaviour in tw100 modeis inconsistent with the kernel when IEXTEN is disabled.


--
Vincent Rivière

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>

References:
- [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] machine depend sysdir extension
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Arrow keys in nano
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread