Re: [MiNT] [PATCH] Machine dependent module path extension

[Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk> wrote:

But I want to be sure that introducing something like this doesn't leave us in a state of disrepair when the system goes hunting for files that are incorrect. We need failsafe options.

I don't know, how is that different from what we have today? Even with the strictly machine only directories nobody prevents you to copy there an improper module. If we want to play it safe, we should fix it on loader level, i.e. introduce something as mintlib does, cpu (machine) based check from header.

-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org