[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Software IDE

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Software IDE
From: Thomas Jürges <thomas@senmut.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:03:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <001c72dc.01dc65002018@smtp.freeola.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <op.w7wcb7zpofd6j1@nebbiolo.upc.de> <001c72dc.01dc65002018@smtp.freeola.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2013-12-18 21:29, Peter Slegg wrote:
> I used emacs and an improved emax in the mid-80s and it was
> rubbish then. Little better than SOS on a DEC-1021. I don't know if
> micro- emacs is any better but unless it's GEM I'm not bothering.

Unless it is not anything like Emacs, I am not bothering.  :-)


Cheers,
	T.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlKyG8AACgkQSwr0ZkS0/dy5HAD7B52yt11kK5SGvId3RhJSn3Zz
ZWKgD4wW2uLLbrbNOMwBAKTaBwu4v+CpbPmOs41l575D5A45la3NzYq6hC/IV4Yw
=/jCF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Software IDE
  - From: "Helmut Karlowski" <helmut.karlowski@ish.de>
- Re: [MiNT] Software IDE
  - From: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Packages upgraded
Next by Date: [MiNT] [PATCH] ONLCR ssh stairs effect
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Software IDE
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Software IDE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread