Re: [MiNT] ***SPAM*** Re: Issue with Mint 1.19 and Litchi

[Pierre Ton-That <ptonthat@club-internet.fr>]

Bonsoir,

- GFA code may be not speakable enough for most of you.
- gemdos(68 in TTRAM, with size of 70MB) was OK in MiNT 1.18. This 70MB 
file was a one of 'Elansar' game archive.
- the same gemdos(68...) returned negative value in MiNT 1.19, I had to 
add some code to reduce size until the gemdos(68...) succeeded and 
download parts instead in one row.

If nobody can anwser this question, where can I find the history (github 
or svn)?

Cheers

Raj

Le 04/02/2015 20:47, Alan Hourihane a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Sample code speaks volumes. If you have a test case, then it's easier to
> determine if it's on purpose or not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan.
>
> On 04/02/15 19:17, Pierre Ton-That wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Speaking of MiNT changes, from 1.18 to 1.19, I noticed one can't
> > malloc very big blocks. There is a limitation (about 1 MB ?). Could
> > not malloc 70 MB (MegaBytes) for a very big file for download in one
> > row. FireBee RAM is large enough.
> > Is this a feature or a bug? Was it done on purpose?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Raj
> >
> > Le 03/02/2015 23:07, Vincent Rivière a écrit :
> > > By looking at the source changes between that October version and the
> > > current one, I see: