Re: [MiNT] ***SPAM*** Re: Issue with Mint 1.19 and Litchi

[Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>]

I don't think anything was done on purpose that relates to this between
1.18 and 1.19. But the CVS can be viewed online here....

http://sparemint.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/

or downloaded...

http://wiki.sparemint.org/index.php/CVS

Alan.

On 04/02/15 20:14, Pierre Ton-That wrote:
> Bonsoir,
>
> - GFA code may be not speakable enough for most of you.
> - gemdos(68 in TTRAM, with size of 70MB) was OK in MiNT 1.18. This
> 70MB file was a one of 'Elansar' game archive.
> - the same gemdos(68...) returned negative value in MiNT 1.19, I had
> to add some code to reduce size until the gemdos(68...) succeeded and
> download parts instead in one row.
>
> If nobody can anwser this question, where can I find the history
> (github or svn)?
>
> Cheers
>
> Raj
>
> Le 04/02/2015 20:47, Alan Hourihane a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sample code speaks volumes. If you have a test case, then it's easier to
>> determine if it's on purpose or not.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> On 04/02/15 19:17, Pierre Ton-That wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Speaking of MiNT changes, from 1.18 to 1.19, I noticed one can't
>>> malloc very big blocks. There is a limitation (about 1 MB ?). Could
>>> not malloc 70 MB (MegaBytes) for a very big file for download in one
>>> row. FireBee RAM is large enough.
>>> Is this a feature or a bug? Was it done on purpose?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Raj
>>>
>>> Le 03/02/2015 23:07, Vincent Rivière a écrit :
>>>> By looking at the source changes between that October version and the
>>>> current one, I see:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>