[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Mandir
Yep, so I'm inclined to use that. But many of these sparemint packages
were made before the year 2000 even so I figured I'd check. I think
most people are probably more interested in a modern setup and tooling
on a 680x0 or above system. 68000 with 4mb ram, I'm not sure how you'd
make useful ;)
Mark
On 10/20/2015 05:01 PM, ragnar wrote:
> Hey,
>
> FHS says /usr/share/man is the default for Unix like operation systems.
> See Here: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html
>
> Cheers
>
> Am 20. Oktober 2015 22:41:40 MESZ, schrieb Mark Duckworth
> <mduckworth@atari-source.org>:
>
> Does anyone have any opinions on the mandir location? mint seems to be
> mixed opinion where some packages follow a normal /usr/share/man while
> many packages are /usr/man and apparently q-funk was a partial driver of
> this. maybe /usr/man is the BSD standard. Does anyone object to my use
> of /usr/share/man? I tend to follow the path that requires the least
> special exceptions and customization to the gnu packages.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.