[Freemint-list] tos.hyp automated and live

[Miro Kropáček]

On 28 February 2017 at 12:41, Thorsten Otto <admin at tho-otto.de> wrote:

> So my code is not too sensitive, you would get errors anyway when trying to
> compile the resulting stg file, or links to wrong pages. UDO was just the
> better place to check for duplicates because it can tell you the source
> locations.
>

Actually, there seems to be one important difference. Overall, SVN UDO
complains about 602 errors and 4108 notes/warning when assembling the STG
file while your UDO gives only 9 errors (the duplicate labels/nodes), 1
warning and 18 notes. So you can imagine my surprise to realise that SVN
UDO despite that generates the STG file while yours creates a zero bytes
long file. Any chance you can take a look?


-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.atariforge.org/pipermail/freemint-list/attachments/20170228/7de09e07/attachment.html