[Freemint-list] tos.hyp automated and live

[Miro Kropáček]

Also, the end result doesn't look bad:
http://mikro.atari.org/private/index.hyp (your compiler has warned me about
some redefinition but the end result looks just fine).

On 28 February 2017 at 15:20, Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 28 February 2017 at 12:41, Thorsten Otto <admin at tho-otto.de> wrote:
>
>> So my code is not too sensitive, you would get errors anyway when trying
>> to
>> compile the resulting stg file, or links to wrong pages. UDO was just the
>> better place to check for duplicates because it can tell you the source
>> locations.
>>
>
> Actually, there seems to be one important difference. Overall, SVN UDO
> complains about 602 errors and 4108 notes/warning when assembling the STG
> file while your UDO gives only 9 errors (the duplicate labels/nodes), 1
> warning and 18 notes. So you can imagine my surprise to realise that SVN
> UDO despite that generates the STG file while yours creates a zero bytes
> long file. Any chance you can take a look?
>
>
> --
> MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
> http://mikro.atari.org
>



-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.atariforge.org/pipermail/freemint-list/attachments/20170228/58334269/attachment-0001.html