[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tosfs, faster hash function...

To: nox@jelal.north.de (Juergen Lock)
Subject: Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
From: Julian Reschke <reschke@GOEDEL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 94 10:43:16 MET DST
Cc: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu (MiNT-Liste)
In-reply-to: <9402232216.AA00510@jelal.north.de>; from "Juergen Lock" at Feb 23, 94 11:16 pm
Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, Germany Department of Mathematics

> 
>  does the second loop improve results?
> 
>  just a thought...
> 	Juergen
>

It's adds a level of security: <Nul>x and <Nul><Nul>x don't have the same
CRC anymore.
 
> PS: there is a problem too with using start clusters: 0 byte files...

Really? I'm not sure that this is really an issue...


-- 
---------------------------------------------------
Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-48161 Muenster
 eMail: reschke@math.uni-muenster.de jr@ms.maus.de
___________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
  - From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>

References:
- Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
  - From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>

Prev by Date: Re: mag!x
Next by Date: Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
Previous by thread: Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
Next by thread: Re: tosfs, faster hash function...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread