Re: tosfs, faster hash function...

[Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>]

Julian Reschke writes:

> >  does the second loop improve results?
> > 
> >  just a thought...
> > 	Juergen
> >
> 
> It's adds a level of security: <Nul>x and <Nul><Nul>x don't have the same
> CRC anymore.

 oh.  then start off with -1 and invert the result... (but is \0\0 an
issue here? :)
>  
> > PS: there is a problem too with using start clusters: 0 byte files...
> 
> Really?

 well since they take up no FAT entries...  what about using the
directory sector and offset?

>  I'm not sure that this is really an issue...

 well not for me, i prefer real filesystems with real inodes anyway... :)

 cheers
	Juergen
-- 
J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
								...ohne Gewehr
PGP public key fingerprint =  8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12  1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA