[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
> With the system handling Xbra (BTW, has anyone read the extended
>XBRA, where a JMP instruction is put between the address and the XBRA ids?
>That way you just BRA to the JMP to fall through. It's not fully
>compatible with existing XBRA though)
and because of this IMO it should not be used....... I mean what is the
point of a standard if someone changes it ? maybe under a new name XJMP
it would be okay, but I prefer optimised code, and jumping around here
there and everywhere hits system performance..... especially on a
XBRA vector changing program, eg. patching into the _hz_200 clock.
email on the Net to: email@example.com