Re: gem.sys sources (fwd)

[Oliver Teuber <hiot@sun.rz.tu-clausthal.de>]

> > |>or (2) a GEM server running on top of X11. (2) would also have the
> > |>advantage of perhaps being portable to Linux/68K.
> > |>
> > |>Is there interest in this? Or does no-one use the AES any more?
> > |>
> > I am still using it, but the missing support for user ids in the Aes is
> > disturbing me more and more :) And of course the Psemaphore call in the
> > trap handler, which is avoiding ALL parallelity of GEM calls.
> > 
> I totally agree to this -- but GEM is really not bad! It's just lacking
> support and further development. And if we can't have the original,
> let's do a better version ourselves.
> 

gem for x sounds great ...

i am working on an gem/tos port to linux/pc (vgalib).

its to bad. everyone is working on his own gem-port.
we should work togehter at one new gem-version ...

cu oliver
-- 
     ____        ___
    /   /  /     /     Oliver Teuber         hiot@sun.rz.tu-clausthal.de
   /   /  /     /      Schulweg 8            hiot@linux.rz.fh-hannover.de
  /   /  /     /       D-37534 Badenhausen   http://www.tu-clausthal.de/~hiot/
 /___/  /__  _/_       Phone +49 5522 84517  Hamradio: DH0OAE@DB0NHM-15

 ftp.tu-clausthal.de: FTP-Server for HAM-RADIO,ATARI,LINUX,UNIX,DOS,MAC,AMIGA