[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gcc (Re: porting?)
On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Jan Paul Schmidt wrote:
> > > >> reading about 30 kB long CHANGELOG of MiNT GCC 184.108.40.206 (don't have it
> > > >> handy). I am afraid the changes were not sent back to GCC maintainers...
> > > >> But I must check it first to be sure.
> > > >
> > > >Just send it back to them.
> > >
> > > ??? Changelog and diffs are two different things. And I have never seen the
> > > GCC 2.7.2 MiNT diffs!
> > The people who did ports of gcc 2.7.2 applied the diffs from 2.6.3. Don't
> > know, why they did not included their new diffs.
> Christian made a lot of new changes in his GCC 220.127.116.11.
Namely? I only saw some visible changes with the linker and the search
By the way, gcc has the option -fpic to produce address independant code.
Is this fully supported for the m68k in 18.104.22.168? I tried to produce a
object file with this, but only got some internal errors when cc1 was
invoked. Bug in port?
Would be a nice feature.