[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What would it take? (mintlibs)

To: gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de
Subject: Re: What would it take? (mintlibs)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: 15 Jun 1998 11:00:51 +0200
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: Guido Flohr's message of "Fri, 12 Jun 1998 03:00:52 +0200"
References: <Pine.BSI.3.96.980610224734.5200B-100000@usr09.primenet.com> <19980612030052.60584@stud.uni-sb.de>

Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de> writes:

|> Whenever I encountered fchmod in foreign sources I changed the sources
|> instead.  BTW, is fchmod() portable at all?  IMHO this call doesn't
|> really fit into the layout of an average Unix filesystem.

Huh?  All Unix filesystems are inode based, where references to unnamed
files are nothing unusual.  This makes fchmod a natural thing on them.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de              completely different"
schwab@gnu.org

References:
- Re: What would it take? (mintlibs)
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: Re: mint eviorment
Next by Date: Re: New executable format (was mem.h)
Previous by thread: Re: What would it take? (mintlibs)
Next by thread: Re: What would it take? (mintlibs)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread