[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Why not O3

To: flecoat@lami.univ-evry.fr
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: 03 Apr 2001 17:52:01 +0200
Cc: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <3AC9C531.2070701@ief.u-psud.fr>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104031406060.12335-100000@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> <3AC9C531.2070701@ief.u-psud.fr>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.101

François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr> writes:

|> "-O2" is the default optimization level of GCC

The default is -O0.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab                                  "And now for something
SuSE Labs                                        completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread