[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] GEM boost

To: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] GEM boost
From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:43:13 -0400
Cc: Mint List <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1121466222.5412.46.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42D815C8.1020300@chello.nl> <1121466222.5412.46.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 17:23 -0500, Evan Langlois wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:00 +0200, Henk Robbers wrote:
> > I like GEM very much. Although it looks like a little
> > tedious in its usage, once you have written 1 GEM program you
> > mostly have dealt with the issues for further GEM programs.
> 
> Tedious?  By comparison to what?  GTK isn't any easier.
> 

I've written for both and I have to disagree here.  GTK at least has a
lot of code you can reuse.

As for your comments about gnome on linux.  It is a dog unless you have
a 2ghz athlon 64..  Then it's almost as fast as a CT60 with GEM ;-)

Mark

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] GEM boost
  - From: Martin Tarenskeen <m.tarenskeen@zonnet.nl>

References:
- [MiNT] GEM boost
  - From: Henk Robbers <h.robbers@chello.nl>
- Re: [MiNT] GEM boost
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread