[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS

To: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:09:15 +0200
Cc: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <4CB1CE12.1030304@freesbee.fr> ("Vincent Rivière"'s message of "Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:30:42 +0200")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTi=gAbPmn53y1eDGnFHRSqbJhbADMQ_ohRUdQ1zH@mail.gmail.com> <4CB1CE12.1030304@freesbee.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr> writes:

> On the other side, the x86 cpus have a nice feature: the assembler ret
> instruction (similar to rts) can take an optional integer argument for
> cleaning the stack after return.

Like rtd.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS
  - From: Miro Kropacek <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] tcp_select / sys_f_select
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Stack restore done by OS
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] GCC 4.5.x bug on volatile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread