[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)

To: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
From: Miro Kropáček <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:15:16 +0200
Cc: mint Persson <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wRoG/PwwwbJnzEhJ89/kd4vVQUBQdQDjzS9XgThEKPk=; b=abLaMYY1BiE0zED/aglrZiHQg8toSxf06xFu4WgJfKiNnP0zaKWeXPvRGmpef6szLC FOJyj5DYyikpw5LcGpq2FnfXThyBm3JEyJ5hFE8qA7mPQK4F89sg0cXYuwdUp3TYTT3Z lpcIcdIH1meovXL9vMhtbbYfuLQRJy0WlIX7E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=F6p6n2hAAjsXt6g6MuNDHMIgb/qdsQvPZW3FQiKe5jzadS6tKqtQXBlbGND/tiEo9p Fd2iLCPVawfwWWZwKNpGSkirXXXm28Ztn55e9xz+gHwZi5T4Ux5UZHOP8+JrVvfAYupx rVjZdfRngz3wGQtqBctCUIjjR86LG+oN76lPc=
In-reply-to: <ECDC0E22-5BD6-44DC-B2E8-6D11C76AE1A1@gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <ECDC0E22-5BD6-44DC-B2E8-6D11C76AE1A1@gmail.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

1. Why should XaAES make assumptions about this stuff? I guess it is to prevent the user from making mistakes, but if you put a screen enhancer (centscreen, blowup etc) into the equation,

the user is still perfectly capable of making similar mistakes anyway.

I agree completely. To me the best way looks to remove this part of code.

Generally, this mode-code approach in xaaes.cnf I find very strange, especially with combination of screen enhancers and/or fvdi configuration, which re-defines the resolution again.

--
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
  - From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>

References:
- [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
  - From: Peter Persson <pep.fishmoose@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
Previous by thread: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Proposed modification to k_init.c (XaAES)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread