[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PPPkit 2.0 (was: Importance of "W" f
On Tue, 25 Nov 1997, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
> >> Multi-user is a growning industry, on the PC side, so why not here?
> >
> >1) Most users do not have multiple computers (particluarly Atari's)
>
> I disagree. All of us here have at least one ST machine and
> either a MEGA-STE, TT or Falcon on top of that.
I have a Falcon, a Mega ST4 and a STE. I plan to upgrade the Mega so I
can use it to read mail and news when I'm home during the holiday, and
the STE is nice for games, but I can't imagine using them in a
network. For what? The only thing that work better on the ST's are
games and demos, and neither works with MiNTOS running...
Nevertheless, I'n *not* against IP-masquerading or anything, it's just
that it complicates matters and is IMO not needed in a basic dial-up
package for beginnners. It's better to compile "add-on packages"
later.
> Others have a couple of Ataris and a Linux box, with a Win95
> Pentium lying around somewhere in the house.
...and hence no need for any masquerading or routing, the
linux/wintel-box handles all this already.
> I have even impressed a highly paid system administrator when I
> showed him my TT running its basic MiNT setup. He couldn't find
> anything nasty about it. In fact, he just loved it and asked if
> he could still buy himself one somewhere.
I can find one very nasty and serious flaw with MiNT that prevents it
from being useful in a professional environment (as anything other
than a dumb terminal): Memory-handling. No way you can run your
MiNT-based server for months, you'll have to reboot it very often due
to fragmentation.
I set my Falcon up as a ftp- and http-server a couple of months ago,
and I had to reboot it every morning even with very modest traffic. I
gave up the project after less than a week.
/*
** Jo Even Skarstein http://www.stud.ntnu.no/~josk/
**
** beer - maria mckee - atari falcon - babylon 5
*/