[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:58:21 +0100
In-reply-to: <19990208012202.57566@stud.uni-sb.de>; from Guido Flohr on Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 01:22:02AM +0100
References: <19990225122314.14230@stud.uni-sb.de> <19990207232215.C814@tubul.dascon.de> <19990208012202.57566@stud.uni-sb.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 01:22:02AM +0100, Guido Flohr wrote:
> 
> But a 1.11 kernel is not a FreeMiNT kernel.  It is a MiNT kernel.

Correct. But uname should not report the name of the kernel, but that of
the whole system, right? 

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

References:
- [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
- Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
  - From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
- Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
  - From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Euro-Sign
Next by Date: [MiNT] MiNT list FAQ
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] uname (conclusion)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread