[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] GCC opinions?

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] GCC opinions?
From: Guido Flohr <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:00:46 +0100
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990223163520.25718C-100000@hal.fishpool.com>; from Martin-Eric Racine on Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 04:37:44PM +0200
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990223163520.25718C-100000@hal.fishpool.com>
Reply-to: gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hi Martin!

On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 04:37:44PM +0200, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
> OK... _which_ recent port of GCC and GAS is the most reliable?
> 
> Some people report 2.7.2.3, others say 2.8.1 works fine, others
> migrate towards EGCS...

Gas is part of the binutils not of gcc.  You mustn't mix up the
version numbers.  Although they are very close right now this is
just by accident (in fact both the binutils and gcc have currently
2.9.1, I think).

Ciao

Guido
-- 
http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000/
mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

It is not doing the thing we like to do, but liking the thing we have to do,
that makes life blessed.
		-- Goethe

References:
- [MiNT] GCC opinions?
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] netcfg
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] drives
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] GCC opinions?
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] GCC opinions?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread