[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Unix future (was: Riebl Ethernet c
- To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] Unix future (was: Riebl Ethernet c
- From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:10:15 +0200
- In-reply-to: <m10yt3H-0040HLC@ebertbd>; from Bernd Ebert on Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 10:09:38AM +0000
- References: <m10yt3H-0040HLC@ebertbd>
- Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 10:09:38AM +0000, Bernd Ebert wrote:
> Hmm, But how do you know for. eg. which interface is meant when
> you are using simply eth0, eth1, eth2,...
How do you know when using two cards of the same type?
> Besides that this is very useful for each kind of admintool,
> because you can determine the type and the requirements of
> the interface out of its name (for e.g. setting of hw-adress).
That does sound reasonable - the rest seems to be more a matter of personal
preferences and not technical reasons.
> > Which is rather sad, because it's a realy efficient, fast and
> > easily understood kind of Unix; very SRV, yet more modern.
>
> True.
Reading CERT and other security-related lists, it seems that it is quite
hacker-friendly ;-)
cu
Michael
--
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen