RE: [MiNT] Was: /proc, will be: /sys

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

> > This may be off topic, but keeping in mind the recent implementation of
> > SLBs (which formally behave like stopped processes), I would think about
> > either a /proc extension (to make possible to differentiate an SLB from a
> > real process after SIGSTOP) or /lib folder, though I don't quite like the
> 
> Are we talking about the file attributes which currently encode the run
> state? Why not just invent a new one?

That was the intention behind "/proc extension".
 
> > Anyways, after playing a bit with SLBs in MiNT and MagiC 6.0, I could say
> > (and this sounds like a sort of life's irony) that Gryfs implementation is
> > better than the original.
> 
> Is this already in a public beta of MiNT?

Yes.

> The issue is that the mentioned
> restriction regarding SLBPATH will probably prevent existing code from
> running...

Yes.

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@atari.org                  |  Atari Falcon030 user   |
|http://www.obta.uw.edu.pl/~draco/      | Moderator gregis LATINE |
|http://draco.atari.org                 |       (loquentium)      |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.