[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern

To: q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi (Martin-Eric Racine)
Subject: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
From: atari@bright.net (Lonny Pursell)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 11:43:20 -0500
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9912072326580.110-100000@rakas>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:27:34 +0200, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:

>On 7.12.1999, Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net> wrote:
>
>> PS. Is your mailer so lame that you must send 2 copies apon every
>> reply?
>
>Is yours so dumb it doesn't filter duplicates?

Insult the Atack guys, nice move.
Yes it filters thanks for reminding me, your address points to
dev/null once again...

__________________________________________________________________
Atari Computer User: Lonny Pursell        E-Mail: atari@bright.net
WWW: http://www.bright.net/~atari/       IRC: lp @ #Atari @ IRCnet

References:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Previous by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread