[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern

Subject: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 23:27:34 +0200
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <aMail1.24b.19991207112340.2078917053@TT030>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On 7.12.1999, Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net> wrote:

> PS. Is your mailer so lame that you must send 2 copies apon every
> reply?

Is yours so dumb it doesn't filter duplicates?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin-Éric Racine            The Atari Stacy and TT030 Homepage
Lappeenranta, Finland          http://members.tripod.com/~TT030/
----------------------------------------------------------------
   "When the time comes, I will know and I shall be."  Q-Funk

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: atari@bright.net (Lonny Pursell)
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: Robert Krenn <robertk@wombat.ludvika.se>
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: Odd Skancke <oskancke@online.no>

References:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: atari@bright.net (Lonny Pursell)

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Previous by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread