Re: [MiNT] Security again

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

Hi,

> Hooking into traps make always problems with memory protection. It also
> automatically reject any virtual addressrom concept.

Speaking of address space virtualization, what is the position of GEM AES
in all that? As I see it - though I must say I don't have a clue about how
specific things are solved in an AES - the concept of the AES' ability to
read/write application's address space (with F_OS_SPECIAL privileges)
relies on the fact that the memory is physically mapped. Or I am errant?

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@atari.org                  |  Atari Falcon030 user   |
|http://www.obta.uw.edu.pl/~draco/      | Moderator gregis LATINE |
|http://draco.atari.org                 |       (loquentium)      |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.