[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern

Subject: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:09:51 +0200
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.19.9.9912072303380.28723-100000@wombat.ludvika.se>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On 7.12.1999, Robert Krenn <robertk@wombat.ludvika.se> wrote:

> > > PS. Is your mailer so lame that you must send 2 copies apon every
> > > reply?
> > Is yours so dumb it doesn't filter duplicates?
> 
> This one qualify as the most stupid remark from M-E Racine
> ever, but then there are a few others too.

If Lonny (or anyone else) is dumb enough to be so rude, he should
not expect anything nice as an answer either.  End of story.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin-Éric Racine            The Atari Stacy and TT030 Homepage
Lappeenranta, Finland          http://members.tripod.com/~TT030/
----------------------------------------------------------------
   "When the time comes, I will know and I shall be."  Q-Funk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: AltF4 <AltF4@atari.org>

References:
- RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
  - From: Robert Krenn <robertk@wombat.ludvika.se>

Prev by Date: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Next by Date: RE: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Previous by thread: [MiNT] Pot calling cattle black :)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] expanded /proc vs new /kern
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread