Re: [MiNT] Thing

[Stanislav Opichal <opichals@alpha.inf.upol.cz>]

On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Frederic Fouche wrote:

> 
> I am not gonna answer for Thomas, but in my opinion, why would Thing need
> to be Open-Source?  shareware, freeware, commercial are also good
> alternatives, especially in the case of Thing.
> My question rather would be, when is 1.29 and 1.3x version gonna be
> released, if ever. As they have been proven to work really well, probably
> better than 1.27.

Well, these are the other reasons to have it open-source what equals to
allow other users to contribute the development and so not to wait for a
new version for about two years (this is the new version "delay", isn't
it?).

regards

STan