[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Shutdown() discussion
Hello!
> > > So let me repeat again, the Cookie was a wrapper for TOS. Feel free to
> > > define a different wrapper for MiNT.
> >
> > It's just the problem that you invent a hackish interface again and now
> > I must adapt the kernel to workaround these wrong designed interface.
>
> I don't understand what is hackish on adding one or two calls. Or did
> you mean the kernel would have to workaround the cookie? No. The cookie
> is not there. Forget it. There is no cookie.
Hmm, all spoke here about this NF cookie with callback functions ...
> Currently NatFeats use two function calls - one for obtaining the ID and
> the other one for actually invoking the function. Can you imagine adding
> two such calls to internal MiNT API or is this the hackish interface as
> you call it?
The hackish was meant for an callback based cookie interface (like XHDI,
SCSIDRV, STIK and so on).
Ciao
...Frank
--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 060
-----------------------------------------
http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~fnaumann/
e-Mail: fnaumann@freemint.de