[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
From: mikro <mikro@hysteria.sk>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:01:53 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0503161058080.421@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1110957748.9126.62.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com> <20050316105445.108f32ad.mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr> <Pine.NEB.4.62.0503161058080.421@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

> No, you understand me wrong. It's just a lot of work and until gcc 3.3 the 
> compiler was not in such a stable state that the work was worthwhile.
>
btw how it's with newer version of 2.95? If I remember correctly, cross-mint
stuff at sparemint site contains 2.95.1 and FreeMiNT some newer version. I
know, there are probably no big differences, I'm just curious why we use
still that old version for cross-compiling.

-- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MiKRO         Atari XE/XL/Mega STE/Falcon060         http://mikro.atari.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

References:
- [MiNT] Cross Compiler
  - From: "Evan K. Langlois" <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
  - From: Patrice Mandin <mandin.patrice@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] State of the Union
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] State of the Union
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Cross Compiler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread