[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components

To: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:51:44 -0500
Cc: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <BF09D097.18A34%atari@bright.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BF09D097.18A34%atari@bright.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 23:11 -0400, Lonny Pursell wrote:
> That's actually funny.
> There are no vendors left as they all left the market years ago.
> At least none commercially that I am aware of regarding programming
> languages for the Atari ST.  All long gone.

Its still not the fault of the C library or the people who write them
that some other language can't load the library.  To say that something
should be placed into the OS because some language can't load a library
is just silly.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
- [MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread