[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:02:02 -0400
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1122263505.19747.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0

on 7/24/2005 11:51 PM, Evan Langlois wrote:

> On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 23:11 -0400, Lonny Pursell wrote:
>> That's actually funny.
>> There are no vendors left as they all left the market years ago.
>> At least none commercially that I am aware of regarding programming
>> languages for the Atari ST.  All long gone.
> 
> Its still not the fault of the C library or the people who write them
> that some other language can't load the library.  To say that something
> should be placed into the OS because some language can't load a library
> is just silly.

That's not what said either.  Duh.

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/

References:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by Date: [MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by thread: [MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread