[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:58:35 +0100
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1122263505.19747.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BF09D097.18A34%atari@bright.net> <1122263505.19747.20.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

I've noticed from the CVS for Mintlib that it's support for
_LARGEFILE_SOURCE is experimental.

Does the MintLib 0.57 include largefile support ?

If not, how experimental is it, and when is Mintlib expected to be
updated ?

Thanks,

Alan.

Follow-Ups:
- [MiNT] MEMORY VIOLATION
  - From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.demon.co.uk>
- Re: [MiNT] _LARGEFILE_SOURCE
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by Date: [MiNT] MEMORY VIOLATION
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by thread: [MiNT] MEMORY VIOLATION
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread