Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch

[Guido Flohr <guido@imperia.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maurits van de Kamp schrieb:
>     
> On 14-jan-2008, at 21:39, Guido Flohr wrote:
> 
>> Its purpose is to classify similar hard- and
>> software environments and wipe out marginal differences, for example the
>> difference between different Linux distributions, or similar variations
>> of processor types as the m68k family, x86 processors from Intel and AMD
>> and so on.
> 
> Still, the term 'canonical name' seems to be applied to any concatenated
> set of names. I'm beginning to doubt now whether this is the case for
> system-type-processor-os platform descriptions when I read all this, but
> I know people make a destinction between normal domainnames and
> 'canonical domain names'.

IMHO, "canonical" has nothing to do with concatenation.  What are
"canonical" domain names"?

Regards,
Guido
- --
Империя ООД, управител
ул. Княз-Борис-I № 86, ет. 2, 1000 София, България
http://www.imperia.bg/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHi9V6Oo0HNPWNDz0RAgPTAJwL/PrM+Wybx4L1woShwAOi/S++awCeKytp
DEMkoDUyY3gOJV8Lso4il3I=
=/Ous
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----