[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
To
:
mint@fishpool.com
Subject
: Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From
: Maurits van de Kamp <
maurits@bassment.nu
>
Date
: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:51:58 +0100
Delivered-to
:
fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to
: <
478BD57A.6030908@imperia.net
>
List-help
: <
mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help
>
List-id
: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner
: <
mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi
>
List-post
: <
mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe
>
References
: <
200801141812.13145.jflemaire@skynet.be
> <
00027bd0.01a0b2fa1c3e@smtp.freeola.net
> <
478BC887.2010503@imperia.net
> <
8C7DA51B-F4E0-4E15-AF00-F3E073F5CB4C@bassment.nu
> <
478BD57A.6030908@imperia.net
>
Sender
:
mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
IMHO, "canonical" has nothing to do with concatenation. What are "canonical" domain names"?
subdomain.domain.com is a canonical domain name (I guess it's "in the
same canon" as domain.com, as I wrote previously).
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
Guido Flohr <guido@imperia.net>
References
:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
J F Lemaire <jflemaire@skynet.be>
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
Guido Flohr <guido@imperia.net>
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
From:
Guido Flohr <guido@imperia.net>
Prev by Date:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
Next by Date:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
Previous by thread:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
Next by thread:
Re: [MiNT] gcc 4.2.2 patch
Index(es):
Date
Thread