[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"

To: "Vincent Rivière" <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:53:06 +0100
Cc: mint <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ur7NFbHtEggN1gCcsrfDzPmmA+Dx0OoRuOCJr4cjo9o=; b=T/i6uwToC5ckaMiXMAzk6eTXMZl//N5ZD5JJ4mSjRiO4r4DJk10AghyIOa3VIEQlK05AgEtoCOz9Z0KpxidQOnxHp346nQAVFd3Y2LyC3ct5irhO6rQmD8QA58h6WIpwCIKF5ety1vfS1kNn+dvzRL87Zzu3PzO+l3PT/VPnHC8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kRgVI1K62rGEfz5shT3flAzs2rx/DicIssm5P+Kl5qGU9AqAhEHuwmzcKonFJN8AbXTahY/f3/+mReh3Vhd23hHZRScA257i/y3NzWc9wCzSYVQZKwWRTHWR9Rt61knYMZGoIQSZ/Kf/HW/jOwfgE/FlrIqdHea1iWIfpVjp4SA=
In-reply-to: <47932064.4000102@freesbee.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c6533ef60801181759k5ec4a927l8d8e8faed3690e4@mail.gmail.com> <47924940.9080507@freesbee.fr> <c6533ef60801191129n1f9c412eu65ef5e4f5f3a1f97@mail.gmail.com> <47932064.4000102@freesbee.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

> Just a quick word to say I managed to compile run the testcase.
> If works when compiled natively with GCC 2.95.3, but it fails when
> cross-compiled with GCC 4, even in debug mode.
> Now I will play with GDB in order to see what's wrong.
>
hooray :) ehm, I don't mean hooray there's a bug in gcc4 but i'm happy
you're able to reproduce it. ;) Maybe it helps to catch that c++ bug,
too.

btw, if it's not enough, as i mentioned, i've tried to compile -m68060
gcc4 and in stage2 there's some real (!) internal error -- no bus
error, no memory violation, just message internal bus error, it has
something to do with 'as' probably (still use 2.13) since it's
gcc/config/m68k/lb1sf68.asm what is failing. Unfortunately, I have no
time to play with it (school exam) but I'll let you know asap.

-- 
MiKRO / Mystic Bytes
http://mikro.atari.org

References:
- [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
  - From: MiKRO <miro.kropacek@gmail.com>
- Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT list Archive & MiNTLib
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc4 vs gcc2 crash "test case"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread