[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs

To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Subject: Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:49:02 +0200
In-reply-to: <4A97DD10.9080301@freesbee.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A97D65D.6090100@freesbee.fr> <1251465873.4726.16.camel@petr> <4A97DD10.9080301@freesbee.fr>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

Vincent Rivière píše v Pá 28. 08. 2009 v 15:35 +0200:
> Petr Stehlik wrote:
> > FYI, Standa says that Fstat64() is disabled in hostfs because we would
> > run into issues with UTC vs localtime on both host and guest.
> 
> I wonder why there are more timestamp issues with Fstat64() than with 
> Fxattr()... Anyway, I'm not familiar with those APIs.

because Fxattr has 16-bit local time while Fstat64 32-bit UTC?

Petr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@boerde.de>

References:
- [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
  - From: Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@sophics.cz>
- Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
  - From: Vincent Rivière <vincent.riviere@freesbee.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] symlinks and hostfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread