Re: [MiNT] patch:MiNT:KM_FREE

[Jo Even Skarstein <joska@online.no>]

Helmut Karlowski skreiv:

> Yes - I'm asking me this too - I'm not an expert on this. Today I had 
> the idea, fvdi should rather be an xdd than a km, because I think xdd 
> stands for extended device driver.

Applications interface with xdd's through it's entry in the /dev 
filesystem. fVDI would have to work through a trap-handler (preferably 
the same as XaAES, to make it more efficient), which I don't think is 
very clean for a XDD.

Jo Even