do KM in the context of these and other threads, not constitute XIF,
XFS and XDD at least from the kernels point of view, and if not, why?
The only difference noted here is that they are hardware and/or
drivers, and XaAES is not. AES is technically a driver that abstracts
visual display/desktop, in the same way hardware drivers are an
abstraction of the hardware.
Yes - I'm asking me this too - I'm not an expert on this. Today I had the idea, fvdi should rather be an xdd than a km, because I think xdd stands for extended device driver.
I don't remember where, but i think i read sometime ago, that the idea was to replace in the future all XDDs by KMs, can someone confirm this?